4.7 Article

Uniform arrangement of gold nanoparticles on magnetic core particles with a metal-organic framework shell as a substrate for sensitive and reproducible SERS based assays: Application to thequantitation of Malachite Green and thiram

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 186, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-3257-4

关键词

Metal organic framework (MOF); Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS); Enhancement substrate; Plasmonic nanoparticles; Magnetic material; Multifunctional hybrid

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21705063, 21665011]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20161BAB203088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetite (Fe3O4) spheres acting as a core were evenly decorated with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and coated with a shell of a metal organic framework (MOF) of type MIL-100(Fe). The resulting hybrid nanomaterial of type Fe3O4-Au@MIL-100(Fe) hybrid is shown to be a viable new SERS substrate. The integration of magnetic core, build-in plasmonic gold nanoparticles and a MOF shell endows the Fe3O4-Au@MIL-100(Fe) with highly efficient magnetic separation and enrichment ability, abundant interparticle hotspots, and significant chemical enhancement effect. This leads to a large enhancement, and greatly improved reproducibility of the SERS signals as shown for Malachite Green (MG) and the fungicide thiram. MG in solution can be quantified with a 50-fold lower detection limit (0.14nM for peak at 1398cm(-1)) and largely improved reproducibility (RSD=9%, 1398cm(-1)) when compared to the use of (a) AuNPs anchored on MIL-100(Fe) (RSD=27%, 1186cm(-1)), or (b) AuNPs embedded in MIL-100(Fe) (RSD=36%, 1398cm(-1)). The method was applied to the quantitation of MG and thiram in spiked water samples. The lower limits of detection are 4.4nM for MG (1398cm(-1)) and 15nM for thiram (1380cm(-1)), respectively, and signals' RSDs are 13% (1398cm(-1)) and 5% (1380cm(-1)) for MG and thiram, respectively. The substrate is recyclable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据