4.7 Article

Sparse structural system identification method for nonlinear dynamic systems with hysteresis/inelastic behavior

期刊

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 813-842

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.033

关键词

Nonlinear structural system identification; Sparse regularization; Hysteresis; Inelastic behavior; Negative stiffness device; Model selection; Cross validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A system identification technique suitable for single degree of freedom (SDOF) and multiple degree of freedom (MDOF) structural systems with either nonlinear elastic or inelastic/hysteretic behavior is proposed in this paper. The method is a parametric modeling technique based on sparse regularization. The proposed framework is capable of discovering the underlying governing equations of the system of interest from input-output data. We build on the work of Brunton et al. (2016) by including functions that allow the discovery of significant nonlinearities, and hystertic or inelastic behavior with permanent deformation. We also present model selection using sparse regularization and cross validation using Akaike criteria. We demonstrate through experimental validation that the technique presented in this paper is applicable to a significantly broader class of problems. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated through numerical examples of a 2 -story nonlinear or inelastic building with a adjustable stiffness device. We also present experimental validation using a unique nonlinear structural system that consists of a MDOF structural system and a nonlinear negative stiffness device (NSD) to illustrate the significant ability of the proposed framework. We successfully identify the following structural systems from experimental data: a SDOF yielding frame without NSD; a SDOF yielding frame with NSD; and a 3-DOF frame with NSD. The extracted sparse model also shows potential for generalization. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据