4.7 Article

Clarity™ digital PCR system: a novel platform for absolute quantification of nucleic acids

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 409, 期 7, 页码 1869-1875

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-0131-7

关键词

Tube-strip digital PCR; Absolute DNA quantification; Sample partitioning; Clarity

资金

  1. Singapore Polytechnic and the Singapore Totalisator Board [11-27801-45-2815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) has gained recognition in biomedical research as it provides a platform for precise and accurate quantification of nucleic acids without the need for a standard curve. However, this technology has not yet been widely adopted as compared to real-time quantitative PCR due to its more cumbersome workflow arising from the need to sub-divide a PCR sample into a large number of smaller partitions prior to thermal cycling to achieve zero or at least one copy of the target RNA/DNA per partition. A recently launched platform, the Clarity (TM) system from JN Medsys, simplifies dPCR workflow through the use of a novel chip-in-a-tube technology for sample partitioning. In this study, the performance of Clarity (TM) was evaluated through quantification of the single-copy human RNase P gene. The system demonstrated high precision and accuracy and also excellent linearity across a range of over 4 orders of magnitude for the absolute quantification of the target gene. Moreover, consistent DNA copy measurements were also attained using a panel of different probe- and dye-based master mixes, demonstrating the system's compatibility with commercial master mixes. The Clarity (TM) was then compared to the QX100 (TM) droplet dPCR system from Bio-Rad using a set of DNA reference materials, and the copy number concentrations derived from both systems were found to be closely associated. Collectively, the results showed that Clarity (TM) is a reliable, robust and flexible platform for next-generation genetic analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据