4.7 Article

Tuning the Structure, Stability, and Responsivity of Polymeric Arsenical Nanoparticles Using Polythiol Cross-Linkers

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 992-1003

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b02459

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under Molecular Organization and Assembly in Cells Doctoral Training Centre (MOAC-DTC) [EP/F500378/1]
  2. ARC
  3. Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award [WM130055]
  4. Leverhulme Trust [ECF/2015-075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of organic arsenicals in polymer chemistry and biomaterials science is limited despite the distinctive and versatile chemistry of arsenic. The interchangeable oxidation states of arsenic and the subsequent changes in chemical properties make it a promising candidate for redoxresponsive materials. Thus, reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization has been employed for the first time to synthesize thermoresponsive organic arsenical containing block copolymers. The polymers undergo simultaneous self-assembly and cross-linking, via the organic arsenical pendant groups, under reductive conditions (to reduce As(V) to As(III)) in the presence of polythiol reagents as cross-linkers. The formation of As-S bonds stabilizes the nanoparticles formed (D-h = 19-29 nm) and enables the stability and responsivity to oxidative stress of the particles, in aqueous and model biological solutions, to be tuned as a function of the number of thiols in the cross-linker or the [SH]/[As] stoichiometric ratio. The parent block copolymers and nanoparticles are nontoxic in vitro, and the tunable responsivity of these nanoparticles and the (bio)chemical activity of organic arsenical reagents could be advantageous for targeted drug delivery and the other bio(nano)medical applications. To the best our knowledge, this is the first time that arsenic-thiolate (As-S) bonding has been employed for stimuli-responsive cross-linking of polymeric nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据