4.1 Article

Nitroxide-Mediated Polymerization of Bio-Based Farnesene with a Functionalized Methacrylate

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mren.201800080

关键词

alkoxyamine initiators; dienes; functional methacrylates; nitroxide-mediated polymerization; thermoplastic elastomers

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [288125]
  2. McGill Sustainability Systems Initiative New Ideas Fund
  3. McGill University Faculty of Engineering
  4. McGill Engineering Doctoral Awards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Farnesene (Far) is a bio-based terpene monomer that is similar in structure to commercially used dienes like butadiene and isoprene. Nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP) is adept for the polymerization of dienes, but not particularly effective at controlling the polymerization of methacrylates using commercial nitroxides. In this study, Far is statistically copolymerized with a functional methacrylate, glycidyl methacrylate (GMA), by NMP using N-succinimidyl modified commercial BlocBuilder (NHS-BB) initiator. Reactivity ratios are determined to be r(Far) = 0.54 +/- 0.04 and r(GMA) = 0.24 +/- 0.02. The ability of the poly(Far-stat-GMA) chains to reinitiate for chain extension with styrene showed a clear shift in molecular weight and monomodal distribution. Copolymerizations using a new alkoxyamine, Dispolreg 007 (D7), is explored as it is shown to homopolymerize methacrylates, but not yet reported for statistical copolymerizations. Bimodal molecular weight distributions are observed when an equimolar ratio of Far and GMA is copolymerized with D7 due to slow decomposition of the initiator, but chain ends are active as shown by successful chain extension with styrene. Both NHS-BB and D7 initiators are used to synthesize poly[Far-b-(GMA-stat-Far)] and poly(Far-b-GMA) diblock copolymers. While the NHS-BB initiated polymer chains have lower dispersity, D7 exhibits more linear polymerization kinetics and maintains more active chain ends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据