4.7 Article

Synchrotron radiation-based multi-analytical approach for studying underglaze color: The microstructure of Chinese Qinghua blue decors (Ming dynasty)

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 928, 期 -, 页码 20-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.04.053

关键词

Chinese porcelains; Cobalt speciation; Full-field XANES; mu XRF; mu XRD

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. National Science Foundation of China [41103013]
  3. Education Department of Guangdong, China [2013WSYS0001]
  4. XU GUANGQI program [34389UD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we develop a methodological approach combining macro-X-ray fluorescence and synchrotron radiation-based techniques (mu XRF, full-field XANES and mu XRD) to determine the composition and microstructure of underglaze decors of Qinghua porcelains (Ming dynasty). Various transition metal elements (Fe, Mn, Co) are present in the blue decoration of these ceramics and the approach proposed allows for establishing the feature of each. Thus it shows that Fe ions are distributed homogeneously over the whole glaze without any significant difference in blue and white parts. They do not play a significant role in the color. In contrast, Co ions exhibit a heterogeneous distribution with CoAl2O4 particles close to the body/glaze interphase. These particles play a key role in the blue color and, the hue variations seem in greater part to link to their density and repartition. Co dispersed in the glassy matrix is also bivalent and mainly in tetragonal coordination, leading also to a blue color. Mn ion distribution is similar to the one of Co but without presenting local high concentrations associated to Mn based particles. Mn affects the darkness of the color and for the sample without CoAl2O4 particle; it is the main color contribution. The presence of CoAl2O4 crystals was confirmed by mu XRD, which revealed, in addition, a variation of cell parameters certainly linking to a Co partial substitution. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据