4.4 Article

Biologically mediated weathering in modern cryptogamic ground covers and the early Paleozoic fossil record

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY
卷 176, 期 3, 页码 430-439

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC PUBL HOUSE
DOI: 10.1144/jgs2018-191

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural History Museum (London) Origins and Evolution Initiative
  2. Advanced Imaging of Materials (AIM) Facility (EPSRC) within the College of Engineering at Swansea University [EP/M028267/1]
  3. Carl Zeiss Microscopy
  4. EPSRC [EP/M028267/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific micro-weathering features and biochemically derived residues formed by living organisms can be used as biomarkers to infer the presence of biological communities within sedimentary units of ancient ecosystems. We examined basaltic soil minerals from modern cryptogamic ground covers (CGCs) in Iceland and compared these with two early Paleozoic fossil systems. Nine biologically mediated weathering features (BWFs) were identified in modern soils including micron-scale surface trenching and penetrative tunnels, which are attributed to the actions of bacteria, fungi and exudates. Specific BWFs are associated with Fe residues, and with Fe-rich bio-precipitated nodules. Further, putative comparable features and Fe enrichment are identified in palaeosols from the late Silurian (Llansteffan, south Wales) and the Early Devonian (Rhynie chert, Scotland). Although we are cautious about attributing biological affinity to individual isolated features, our results demonstrate the potential of using multiple BWF types as a collective together with their chemical signatures as new proxies to understand community structure and interactions in early terrestrial ecosystems. This new information is the first evidence of interactions between ancient CGC-like organisms and substrate or soil inorganic components in the fossil record, and demonstrates the ability of CGC-like biospheres to contribute to mineral weathering, soil development and biogeochemical cycling during the early Paleozoic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据