4.7 Article

Mechanical, tribological and anti-corrosive properties of polyaniline/graphene coated Mg-9Li-7Al-1Sn and Mg-9Li-5Al-3Sn-1Zn alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 1767-1778

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.03.028

关键词

Mg-Li alloys; Scratch hardness; Plowing hardness; Wear resistance; Corrosion protection efficiency; Charge transfer resistance

资金

  1. Space Technology Cell (IIT Kanpur, and Indian Space Research Organisation)
  2. Swarnajayanti Fellowship from Department of Science and Technology [DST/SJF/ETA-02-2016-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical, tribological and corrosion protection offered to Mg-9Li-7Al-1Sn and Mg-9Li-5Al-3Sn-1Zn alloys by the epoxy coating containing polyaniline/graphene (PANI/Gr) pigments is undertaken in the current work. PANI/Gr containing coatings were observed to be strongly adherent with a higher scratch hardness (H-s) and plowing hardness (H-p), i.e. H-s of 0.43 GPa, and H-p of 0.61 GPa, respectively when compared to that of neat epoxy coating (H-s of 0.17 GPa, and H-p of 0.40 GPa, respectively). Due to their higher H-s and H-p values, PANI/Gr based coatings displayed an enhanced wear resistance (Wear volume, W-v =4.53 x 10(-3) m(3)) than that of neat epoxy coating (W-v = 5.15 x 10(-3) m(3)). The corrosion protection efficiency in corrosive environment of 3.5 wt% NaCl solution was obtained to be >99% for PANI/Gr containing coatings when compared to that of neat epoxy coating. The charge-transfer resistance (R-ct) of the PANI/Gr containing coatings were estimated to be >10(6) Omega cm(2), which indicates their highly protective nature when compared to that of neat epoxy coating (R-ct similar to 10(5) Omega cm(2)). Hence, PANI/Gr containing coatings can be potentially used for wear resistance and corrosion protection applications in marine environments. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据