4.7 Article

Analysis of the Tumor Reactivity of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Metastatic Melanoma Lesion that Lost Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Expression after Anti-PD-1 Therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 139, 期 7, 页码 1490-1496

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.01.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16K10148]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K10148] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Major histocompatibility complex class I loss due to the abnormality of beta 2-microglobulin gene is one of the mechanisms underlying delayed relapses in melanoma patients long after the initial positive responses to anti-PD-1 therapy. However, the tumor-specific reactivity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in tumor lesions that lost major histocompatibility complex class I expression has not been well evaluated. We report the case of a 55-year-old woman with two metastatic melanoma lesions. After a 12-month period of successful tumor suppression by anti-PD-1 antibody therapy, one lesion started to grow again. We resected both lesions and examined the tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. The shrinking lesion consisted of necrotic tissue and macrophages, and the enlarged lesion consisted of both necrotic tissue and viable tumor cells. The tumor cells completely lost major histocompatibility complex class I expression, but it was restored upon retroviral transduction of the normal beta 2-microglobulin gene. When we checked the tumor-specific reactivity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes derived from the relapsing lesion, we found that these tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes failed to recognize the native tumor cells derived from the lesion, but strongly recognized the major histocompatibility complex class-I-recovered cells by beta 2-microglobulin transduction. Our report emphasizes the limitations of T-cell-based immunotherapy and highlights the importance of developing alternative strategies for such cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据