4.7 Article

Removal kinetics of sulfamethazine and its transformation products formed during treatment using a horizontal flow-anaerobic immobilized biomass bioreactor

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 365, 期 -, 页码 34-43

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.077

关键词

Sulfamethazine; Horizontal flow-anaerobic immobilized biomass bioreactor; Transformation products; SPE-online; LC-MS/MS

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo - Fapesp [12/07153-4, 09/15984-0]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientffico e Tecnologico CNPq [475756/2013-4]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [12/07153-4, 09/15984-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfamethazine (SMZ) is an antibiotic from sulfonamides class widely used in veterinary medicine and reported in wastewater and sewage. Thus, it is essential to study technologies to reduce SMZ present in the aquatic environment. Anaerobic bioreactors are a low-cost technology applied for wastewater treatment. The objective of this paper is to study kinetics parameters related to SMZ removal using a horizontal flow-anaerobic immobilized biomass reactor (HAIR) and to evaluate its transformation products formed during this treatment. The bioreactor was operated at mesophilic condition with a hydraulic retention time of 12 h. The removal of SMZ was evaluated at three different concentrations: 200 ng L-1 (phase I), 400 ng L-1 (phase II) and 600 ng L-1 (phase III). The apparent first-order removal constant obtained for chemical oxygen demand was 0.885 +/- 0.094 h(-1) while SMZ showed a removal constant of 0.356 h(-1). SMZ was removed with an efficiency of 56.0 +/- 13.0 % (phase I); 62.0 +/- 12.0 % (phase II) and 62.0 +/- 6.00 % (phase III). Seven transformation products were detected and one of these with m/z 233 is reported for the first-time. The HAIB bioreactor has a potential to assist in wastewater treatment to remove contaminants at ng L-1 concentration level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据