4.7 Article

Quantitatively assessing the role played by carbonate radicals in bromate formation by ozonation

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 363, 期 -, 页码 428-438

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.013

关键词

Bromate; Carbonate radicals (CO3(center dot) -); Carbonate/bicarbonate; Ozonation; Hydroxyl radical ((OH)-O-center dot)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51525805, 51708563, 51608330]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Project [JCYJ20150403161923535]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bicarbonate scavenges (OH)-O-center dot to form CO3 center dot- that enhances the bromate formation by ozonation. However, the role of CO3 center dot- in the bromate formation during ozonation has never been quantitatively investigated. Herein, we establish a quantitative approach for evaluating the role played by CO3 center dot- based on the detection of CO3 center dot--involved bromate and CO3 center dot- exposure. Experiments demonstrated that the CO3 center dot--involved bromate was responsible for 33.7-69.9% of the total bromate formed with bicarbonate concentrations from 0.5 mM to 4 mM. The CO3 center dot- exposure was two orders of magnitude higher than the corresponding (OH)-O-center dot exposure during ozonation. These results demonstrate that CO3 center dot- plays a comparable or even more pronounced role in the oxidation of bromine during bromate formation than (OH)-O-center dot. A model was developed based on the ratio of bromine oxidized by CO3 center dot-, which could predict the CO3 center dot--involved bromate formation well. Modeled and experimental results illustrated that the contribution of the CO3 center dot--involved bromate to the total bromate decreased with increasing pH or initial bromide, but almost remained unchanged at different ozone dosages. Moreover, the presence of humic acid led to an increase in this contribution during ozonation. The results of this study provide a more in-depth understanding of the mechanism of bromate formation during ozonation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据