4.4 Article

Experimental Evidence for an Eco-Evolutionary Coupling between Local Adaptation and Intraspecific Competition

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 187, 期 4, 页码 447-456

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/685295

关键词

adaptation; competition; density dependence; damselfly; eco-evolutionary dynamics; spatial variation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB1255318]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [1620046] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determining how adaptive evolution can be coupled to ecological processes is key for developing a more integrative understanding of the demographic factors that regulate populations. Intra-specific competition is an especially important ecological process because it generates negative density dependence in demographic rates. Although ecological factors are most often investigated to determine the strength of density dependence, evolutionary processes such as local adaptation could also feed back to shape variation in the strength of density dependence among populations. Using an experimental approach with damselflies, a predaceous aquatic insect, we find evidence that both density-dependent intraspecific competition and local adaptation can reduce per capita growth rates. In some cases, the effects of local adaptation on reducing per capita growth rates exceeded the ecological competitive effects of a doubling of density. However, we also found that these ecological and evolutionary properties of populations are coupled, and we offer two interpretations of the causes underlying this pattern: (1) the strength of density-dependent competition depends on the extent of local adaptation, or (2) the extent of local adaptation is shaped by the strength of density-dependent competition. Regardless of the underlying causal pathway, these results show how eco-evolutionary dynamics can affect a key demographic process regulating populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据