4.3 Article

Biochemical relevance of Cr(III) complexes of isoniazid: synthesis, characterization, DFT, antibacterial screening, antioxidant activity and glucose-lowering effect in STZ-induced diabetic rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF COORDINATION CHEMISTRY
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 664-689

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00958972.2019.1572885

关键词

alpha-Amylase inhibition; Schiff base; type-2 diabetes mellitus; in vivo activity; DFT

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC) through RGNF [F1-17.1/2015-16/RGNF-2015-17-SC-MAD-19472/(SA-III/Website)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular mechanism suggests that the incorporation of an antioxidant organic moiety to chromium will be a sound strategy for the synthesis of safer and more effective hypoglycemic compounds. Two Schiff base ligands were derived by condensation of isonicotinyl hydrazide with salicylaldehyde/o-hydroxyacetophenone which further yield four novel chromium(III) complexes of types [Cr(L)Cl-2(H2O)] and [Cr(L)(2)]Cl. The ligands and complexes were characterized by analytical and spectroscopic techniques. DFT study at the basic set B3LYP and TD-SCF/6-311-G level was employed to confirm the geometry of the investigated compounds. Ligands were tested for their antioxidant activity and exhibited good antioxidant activity. Assessment of insulin-like activity of the complexes was initially performed in vitro by measuring the inhibition of alpha-amylase. The complex with highest in vitro activity was investigated for in vivo antidiabetic activity on the model of STZ-induced diabetic rats, which demonstrated that complex 4 significantly lowers the blood glucose level in rats. Toxicity level and antioxidant activity of the complex were also tested, which exhibit good tolerance level and antioxidant activity. Histological analysis of the pancreas of animals under investigation reveals the good condition of the pancreas treated with the complex. Ligands and complexes were also tested for antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据