4.7 Article

Dietary Calcium Intake and Bone Loss Over 6 Years in Osteopenic Postmenopausal Women

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 104, 期 8, 页码 3576-3584

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2019-00111

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand
  2. Auckland Medical Research Foundation Edith C. Coan Research Fellowship
  3. Kelliher Charitable Trust Emerging Research Start-Up Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Calcium intakes are commonly lower than the recommended levels, and increasing calcium intake is often recommended for bone health. Objective: To determine the relationship between dietary calcium intake and rate of bone loss in older postmenopausal women. Participants: Analysis of observational data collected from a randomized controlled trial. Participants were osteopenic (hip T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5) women, aged >65 years, not receiving therapy for osteoporosis nor taking calcium supplements. Women from the total cohort (n = 1994) contributed data to the analysis of calcium intake and bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline, and women from the placebo group (n = 698) contributed data to the analysis of calcium intake and change in BMD. BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) of the spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body were measured three times over 6 years. Results: Mean calcium intake was 886 mg/day. Baseline BMDs were not related to quintile of calcium intake at any site, before or after adjustment for baseline age, height, weight, physical activity, alcohol intake, smoking status, and past hormone replacement use. There was no relationship between bone loss and quintile of calcium intake at any site, with or without adjustment for covariables. Total body bone balance (i.e., change in BMC) was unrelated to an individuals' calcium intake (P = 0.99). Conclusions: Postmenopausal bone loss is unrelated to dietary calcium intake. This suggests that strategies to increase calcium intake are unlikely to impact the prevalence of and morbidity from postmenopausal osteoporosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据