4.6 Article

A first-principles study of doped black phosphorus carbide monolayers as NO2 and NH3 sensors

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 125, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5081931

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [11704005, 61604002, 11475004]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [162300410325]
  3. Key Project of Scientific and Technological Research of the Education Department of Henan Province [18B140001, 18A140012]
  4. Natural Science research project of the Education Department of Henan Province [12B140003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

First-principles calculations have been carried out to investigate the possibility of B-, N-, Si-, and S-doped black phosphorus carbide monolayers (B-, N-, Si-, and S-bPCs) as efficient gas sensors to detect and eliminate toxic gas molecules such as NO2 and NH3. The influence of O-2 and H2O has also been considered. It is found that O-2, H2O, NO2, and NH3 are all physisorbed on N- and S-bPCs. Nevertheless, the moderate adsorption energy and large charge transfer of NO2 on N-bPC indicate that N-bPC is more suitable to detect NO2. The chemisorption is observed when NO2 and NH3 are adsorbed on B-bPC, and O-2, NO2, and NH3 on Si-bPC, by which highly enhanced sensitivity toward these molecules can be realized. Due to the strong adsorption, B- and Si-bPCs can be used to detect and filter NO2 and NH3 at different working temperatures. The work function has been calculated to further interpret the adsorption mechanism. It increases with B and Si dopants and decreases with N and S dopants. The adsorption of molecules leads to different variations of the work function, which is correlated with the direction of charge transfer. Our theoretical investigations help us better understand the mechanism of bPC as a NO2 and NH3 gas sensor and provide a facile method to broaden its application in industrial, medical, and environmental monitoring. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据