4.7 Article

Resilient Transmission Hardening Planning in a High Renewable Penetration Era

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 873-882

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2872893

关键词

Transmission system resilience; data-driven stochastic programming; wasserstein metric; column-and-constraint generation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-1662589, NSF-1610935]
  2. Advanced Grid Modeling Program at the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hardening components in transmission systems is a practice to improve system resilience against possible disturbances caused by natural disasters. In a power system with a very high penetration of renewable energy, the system hardening will be further complicated by the uncertainty and variability of renewable energy. In this paper, we study the transmission line hardening planing problem in the context of probabilistic power flows injected by the high penetration of renewable energy. We assume that the probabilistic information of renewable energy is incomplete and ambiguous and propose a data-driven approach to approximate the renewable uncertainty sets. We then extend the N - 1 security criteria to multiple simultaneous contingencies and seek to prepare a hardening plan for the worst-case scenarios. A two-stage data-driven stochastic model is formulated by considering the joint worst-case wind output distribution and transmission line contingencies. Then, we apply the Column-and-Constraints generation method to solve the proposed model. To test the effectiveness of the proposed approach, we conduct experiments on 24-bus and 118-bus test systems. We numerically show that the data-driven approach can effectively address the uncertainty ambiguity and the proposed approach can produce effective hardening plans that improve the system resilience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据