4.7 Article

Vitamin C increases DNA breaks and suppresses DNA damage-independent activation of ATM by bleomycin

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 12-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.03.026

关键词

Bleomycin; Vitamin C; Ascorbate; DNA double-strand break; ATM; Superoxide

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES008786, ES028072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bleomycin is a redox-active drug with anticancer and other clinical applications. It is also frequently used as a tool in fundamental research on cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). A conversion of bleomycin into its DNA-breaking form requires Fe, one-electron donors and O-2. Here, we examined how a major biological antioxidant ascorbate (reduced vitamin C), which is practically absent in standard cell culture, impacts cellular responses to bleomycin. We found that restoration of physiological levels of vitamin C in human cancer cells increased their killing by bleomycin in 2D cultures and 3D tumor spheroids. Higher cytotoxicity of bleomycin occurred in cells with normal and shRNA-depleted p53. Cellular vitamin C enhanced the ability of bleomycin by produce DSBs, which was established by direct measurements of these lesions in three cell lines. Vitamin C-restored cancer cells also showed a higher sensitivity to killing by low-dose bleomycin in combination with inhibitors of DSB repair-activating ATM or DNA-PK kinases. The presence of ascorbate in bleomycin-treated cells suppressed a DSB-independent activation of the ATM-CHK2 axis by blocking superoxide radical. In vitro studies detected a greatly superior ability of ascorbate over other cellular reducers to catalyze DSB formation by bleomycin. Ascorbate was faster than other antioxidants in promoting two steps in activation of bleomycin. Our results demonstrate strong activation effects of vitamin C on bleomycin, shifting its toxicity further toward DNA damage and making it more sensitive to manipulations of DNA repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据