4.6 Article

Acute exposure to a glyphosate-containing herbicide formulation inhibits Complex II and increases hydrogen peroxide in the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2018.12.019

关键词

Glyphosate; C. elegans; Mitochondrial inhibition; Oxygen consumption; Reactive oxygen species; Hydrogen peroxide

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [R15 ES015628]
  2. Edward Burke Endowed Chair
  3. National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40 OD010440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glyphosate-based herbicides, such as Touchdown (TD) and Roundup, are among the most heavily-used herbicides in the world. While the active ingredient is generally considered non-toxic, the toxicity resulting from exposure to commercially-sold formulations is less clear. In many cases, cell cultures or various model organisms exposed to glyphosate formulations show toxicity and, in some cases, lethality. Using Caenorhabditis elegans, we assessed potential toxic mechanisms through which a highly-concentrated commercial formulation of TD promotes neurodegeneration. Following a 30-min treatment, we assayed mitochondrial electron transport chain function and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Initial oxygen consumption studies indicated general mitochondrial inhibition compared to controls ((star)p < 0.05). When Complex II activity was further assessed, inhibition was observed in all TD-treated groups ((star)p < 0.05). Complex IV activity, however, was not adversely affected by TD. This electron transport chain inhibition also resulted in reduced ATP levels ((star)p < 0.05). Furthermore, hydrogen peroxide levels, but not other ROS, were increased ((star)p < 0.05). Taken together, these data indicate that commercially-available formulations of TD may exert neurotoxicity through Complex II (succinate dehydrogenase) inhibition, decreased ATP levels, and increased hydrogen peroxide production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据