4.3 Article

Capillary ultrastructure and mitochondrial volume density in skeletal muscle in relation to reduced exercise capacity of patients with intermittent claudication

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00480.2015

关键词

capillary; morphometry; peripheral arterial disease; skeletal muscle; transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030-144167]
  2. University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia [SRG 09-08]
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research-Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intermittent claudication (IC) is the most commonly reported symptom of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Impaired limb blood flow is a major casual factor of lower exercise tolerance in PAD but cannot entirely explain it. We hypothesized that IC is associated with structural changes of the capillary-mitochondria interface that could contribute to the reduction of exercise tolerance in IC patients. Capillary and mitochondrial morphometry were performed after light and transmission electron microscopy using vastus lateralis muscle biopsies of 14 IC patients and 10 age-matched controls, and peak power output (PPO) was determined for all participants using an incremental single-leg knee-extension protocol. Capillary density was lower (411 +/- 90 mm(-2) vs. 506 +/- 95 mm(-2); P <= 0.05) in the biopsies of the IC patients than in those of the controls. The basement membrane (BM) around capillaries was thicker (543 +/- 82 nm vs. 423 +/- 97 nm; P <= 0.01) and the volume density of mitochondria was lower (3.51 +/- 0.56% vs. 4.60 +/- 0.74%; P <= 0.01) in the IC patients than the controls. In the IC patients, a higher proportion of capillaries appeared with collapsed slit-like lumen and/or swollen endothelium. PPO was lower (18.5 +/- 9.9Wvs. 33.5 +/- 9.4 W; P <= 0.01) in the IC patients than the controls. We suggest that several structural alterations in skeletal muscle, either collectively or separately, contribute to the reduction of exercise tolerance in IC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据