4.5 Review

Neurological profiles beyond the sleep disorder in patients with anti-IgLON5 disease

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 493-499

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000677

关键词

anti-IgLON5 disease; chorea; dementia; dysphagia; progressive nuclear palsy

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS) [FIS 18/00067]
  2. CERCA programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Anti-IgLON5 disease is a novel entity characterized by a distinctive sleep disorder associated with a variety of neurological symptoms, antibodies against IgLON5, and pathological findings of neuronal tauopathy. The characteristic sleep disorder occurs in most patients, but other neurological symptoms are also important because they can be the presenting and most disabling problem and mimic other conditions. This review focuses on nonsleep neurological symptoms and presentations of anti-IgLON5 disease. Recent findings Apart from sleep problems, the most frequent neurological symptoms in anti-IgLON5 disease are bulbar dysfunction and gait abnormalities. Other symptoms include movement disorders like chorea or abnormal orofacial movements, oculomotor abnormalities, cognitive impairment, and symptoms of nervous system hyperexcitability. All these symptoms can present in different combinations and severity leading to distinct clinical phenotypes beyond the sleep disorder: bulbar syndrome; syndrome resembling progressive supranuclear palsy; cognitive impairment, sometimes with chorea, mimicking Huntington disease; gait ataxia; and stiff-person-like syndrome. Summary These clinical presentations may suggest degenerative or other neurological disorders, but anti-IgLON5 disease has to be considered, and confirmed by the detection of IgLON5 antibodies, when the criteria for the diagnosis of the initially suspected disorders are not fulfilled, confirmatory laboratory tests are negative, and significant sleep problems are present.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据