4.8 Article

The Hippocampus Encodes Distances in Multidimensional Feature Space

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 1226-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.035

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO-Gravitation) [024-001-006]
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. Kavli Foundation
  4. European Research Council [ERC-CoG GEOCOG 724836]
  5. Centre of Excellence scheme of the Research Council of Norway -Centre for Neural Computation [223262/F50]
  6. Egil and Pauline Braathen and Fred Kavli Centre for Cortical Microcircuits
  7. National Infrastructure scheme of the Research Council of Norway -NORBRAIN [197467/F50]
  8. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [NWO-Vidi 452-12-009, NWO-MaGW 406-14-114, NWO-MaGW 406-15-291]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hippocampal formation encodes maps of the physical environment [1-5]. A key question in neuroscience is whether its spatial coding principles also provide a universal metric for the organization of non-spatial information. Initial evidence comes from studies revealing directional modulation of fMRI responses in humans [6, 7] during navigation through abstract spaces and the involvement of place and grid cells in encoding of non-spatial feature dimensions [8]. However, a critical feature of a map-like representation is information about distances between locations, which has yet only been demonstrated for physical space [4, 9]. Here, we probe whether the hippocampus similarly encodes distances between points in an abstract space spanned by continuous stimulus-feature dimensions that were relevant to the acquisition of a novel concept. We find that, after learning, two-dimensional distances between individual positions in the abstract space were represented in the hippocampal multivoxel pattern as well as in the univariate hippocampal signal as indexed by fMRI adaptation. These results support the notion that the hippocampus computes domain-general, multidimensional cognitive maps along continuous dimensions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据