4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of magnetic field on plasma particles in dusty plasma

期刊

CONTRIBUTIONS TO PLASMA PHYSICS
卷 59, 期 4-5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ctpp.201800136

关键词

cyclotron radius; dust trap; dusty plasma; glow discharge; magnetic field; magnetization of plasma particles

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-32-00130, 18-02-00113]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00009]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00009] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we present the investigation of the formation features and internal structure of dust clouds created in plasma of glow discharge in the external magnetic field corresponding to a range of moderate and strong fields, at which the ion component is magnetized. The analysis of the plasma magnetization in the presence of dust components is carried out. We defined the values of magnetic induction at which the changes in dynamics of plasma particles in magnetic field in light inert gases are expected. The experimental setup was built in two versions. For the purpose of generating of magnetic field, the first setup was equipped with ordinary magnetic coils, and the second one included a superconducting solenoid. The discharge tubes, the main chambers where plasma was ignited and maintained in a glow discharge in lowered pressure, also have certain peculiarities, which we describe below. While using helium as a bulk gas, our study focused only on the dust trap in the region of narrowing discharge current. For neon, we used two traps: the striation trap and one just mentioned above placed in the narrowing of the discharge tube. As a result, the steady dust structures in a glow discharge under the magnetization of ions and electrons were obtained for the first time. Dust structures were rotated and tended to form a dust cluster and shell structure. A number of parameters of magnetization achieved in experiments were calculated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据