4.5 Article

Constraint guided accelerated search for mixed blocking permutation flowshop scheduling

期刊

COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 102-120

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.10.003

关键词

Flowshop; Scheduling; Blocking constraints; Local search

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP150101618]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixed Blocking Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem (MBPFSP) with the objective of makespan minimisation is NP-Hard. It has important industrial applications that include the cider production industry. MBPFSP has made some progress in recent years. However, within practical time limits, existing incomplete algorithms still either find low quality solutions or struggle with large problems. One key reason behind this is the typical way of using generic heuristics or metaheuristics that usually lack problem specific structural knowledge. In MBPFSP, a machine could be blocked with the currently finished job until the subsequent machine is available to process the same job. These blocking constraints affect the makespan. So MBPFSP search should naturally take explicit steps to take the blocking constraints into account. Unfortunately, existing research on MBPFSP just uses only the makespan to compare generated solutions, but the search otherwise is not aware of the blocking constraints. Moreover, existing such methods use either an exhaustive or a random neighbourhood generation strategy. In this work, we aim to advance MBPFSP search by better exploiting the problem specific structural knowledge. We use the constraint and the objective functions to obtain such problem specific knowledge and we exploit such knowledge both in a constructive search method and in a local search method. In this paper, we also present an acceleration method to efficiently evaluate insertion-based neighbourhoods of MBPFSP. Our experimental results on three standard testbeds demonstrate that our proposed algorithms significantly improve over existing best-performing algorithms. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据