4.7 Article

Vancomycin Area Under the Curve and Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-analysis

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 69, 期 11, 页码 1881-1887

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz051

关键词

vancomycin; AUC; nephrotoxicity

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH [R15-AI105742]
  2. National Guard Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. This study analyzed the relationship between vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and acute kidney injury (AKI) reported across recent studies. Methods. A systematic review of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and compiled references was conducted. We included randomized cohort and case-control studies that reported vancomycin AUCs and risk of AKI (from 1990 to 2018). The primary outcome was AKI, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of >= 0.5 mg/L or a 50% increase from baseline on >= 2 consecutive measurements. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Primary analyses compared the impact of AUC cutpoint (greater than similar to 650 mg x hour/L) and AKI. Additional analysis compared AUC vs trough-guided monitoring on AKI incidence. Results. Eight observational studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria with data for 2491 patients. Five studies reported first-24-hour AUCs (AUC0-24) and AKI, 2 studies reported 24- to 48-hour AUCs (AUC24-48) and AKI, and 2 studies reported AKI associated with AUC- vs trough-guided monitoring. AUC less than approximately 650 mg x hour/L was associated with decreased AKI for AUC0-24 (OR, 0.36 [95% CI, .23-.56]) as well as AUC24-48 (OR, 0.45 [95% CI, .27-.75]). AKI associated with the AUC monitoring strategy was significantly lower than trough-guided monitoring (OR, 0.68 [95% CI, .46-.99]). Conclusions. AUCs measured in the first or second 24 hours and lower than approximately 650 mg x hour/L may result in a decreased risk of AKI. Vancomycin AUC monitoring strategy may result in less vancomycin-associated AKI. Additional investigations are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据