4.5 Article

Identification of SLC20A2 deletions in patients with primary familial brain calcification

期刊

CLINICAL GENETICS
卷 96, 期 1, 页码 53-60

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cge.13540

关键词

deletion; functional assay; PFBC; primary familial brain calcification

资金

  1. Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology of Fujian Province [2017Y9094]
  2. Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program of Fujian
  3. National Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81801129]
  5. Preferred Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Scholars from Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of China [LXKY-201701]
  6. Fujian Medical University [2017XQ1071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary familial brain calcification (PFBC) is a rare neurological disorder. Mutations in five genes (SLC20A2, PDGFRB, PDGFB, XPR1, and MYORG) have been linked to PFBC. Here, we used SYBR green-based real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography analysis to detect copy number variants (CNVs) in 20 unrelated patients with PFBC, negatively sequenced for the five known genes. We identified three deletions in SLC20A2, including a large de novo full gene deletion and two exonic deletions confined to exon 2 and exon 6, respectively. Subsequent linked-read whole-genome sequencing of the patient with the large deletion showed a 1.7 Mb heterozygous deletion which removed the entire coding regions of SLC20A2 as well as 21 other genes. In the family with a deletion of exon 6, a missense variant of uncertain significance (SLC20A2: p.E267Q) also co-segregated with the disease. Functional assay showed the deletion could result in significantly impaired phosphate transport, whereas the p.E267Q variant did not. Our results confirm that deletion in SLC20A2 is a causal mechanism for PFBC and highlight the importance of functional study for classifying a rare missense variant as (likely) pathogenic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据