4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Cytochrome P450 1B1 Contributes to the Development of Angiotensin II-Induced Aortic Aneurysm in Male Apoe-/- Mice

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 186, 期 8, 页码 2204-2219

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.04.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL019134, R01 HL079109] Funding Source: Medline
  2. BLRD VA [I01 BX001193] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1B1 is implicated in vascular smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation, and hypertension. We assessed the contribution of CYP1B1 to angiotensin (Ang) II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Male Apoe(-/-)/Cyp1b1(+/+) and Apoe(-/-)/Cyp1b1(-/-) mice were infused with Ang II or its vehicle for 4 weeks; another group of Apoe(-/-) /Cyp1b1(-/-) mice was coadministered the CYP1B1 inhibitor 2,3',4,5'-tetramethoxystilbene (TMS) every third day for 4 weeks. On day 28 of Ang II infusion, AAAs were analyzed by ultrasound and ex vivo by Vernier calipers, mice were euthanized, and tissues were harvested. Ang II produced AAAs in Apoe(-/-)/Cyp1b1(+/+) mice; mice treated with TMS or Apoe(-/-)/Cyp1b1(-/-) mice had reduced AAAs. Ang II enhanced infiltration of macrophages, T cells, and platelets and increased platelet derived growth factor D, Pdgfrb, Itga2, and matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 expression in aortic lesions; these changes were inhibited in mice treated with TMS and in Apoe(-/-)/Cyp1b1(-/-) mice. Oxidative stress resulted in cyclooxygenase-2 expression in aortic lesions. These effects were minimized in Apoe(-/-)/Cyp1b1+/+ mice treated with TMS and in Apoe(-/-)/Cyp1b1(-/-) mice and by concurrent treatment with the superoxide scavenger 4-hydroxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl. CYP1B1 contributed to the development of Ang II induced AAA and associated pathogenic events in mice, likely by enhancing oxidative stress and associated signaling events. Thus, CYP1B1 may serve as a target for therapeutic agents for AAA in males.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据