4.6 Article

Hydration structures of vanadium/oxovanadium cations in the presence of sulfuric acid: A molecular dynamics simulation study

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 683-692

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.10.014

关键词

Vanadium cation; Hydration size; Sulfonate acid; Proton; Molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506019]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT16RC (4) 80, DUT16QY43]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars [T2012049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structure design of proton exchange membrane determines the performance of vanadium redox flow battery. Appropriate pore size of the membrane not only benefits the proton conduction but also blocks the cross contamination of the vanadium cations. For this purpose, hydration sizes of proton, vanadium (II) [V2+], vanadium(III) [V3+], oxovanadium(IV) [VO2+], and dioxovanadium(V) [VO2+] cations were estimated by molecular dynamics simulation based on all-atom force field. The local hydration structures of the vanadium cations were consistent with the previous reports, verifying the adopted force field. V2+, V3+, VO2+, VO2+, and proton exhibit the hydration sizes of 8.24, 8.14, 8.18, 8.34, and 4.12 angstrom in the aqueous mixtures of sulfuric acid and vanadium sulfate. Thus the pore size distribution from 4.12 to 8.14 angstrom was recommended for the membrane fabrication. SO42- prefers to distribute around the vanadium cations due to electrostatic interaction, thus weakening the hydration structures of the vanadium cations. Introducing sulfuric acid decreases the local distributions of SO42- around and V3+, but increases the local distributions of SO42- around VO2+ and VO2+. This work helps to understand the structure of the aqueous mixtures of sulfuric acid and vanadium sulfate. It also provides potential guidance for improving the membrane performance in vanadium redox flow battery. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据