4.7 Article

A calcium-based microporous metal-organic framework for efficient adsorption separation of light hydrocarbons

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 358, 期 -, 页码 446-455

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.034

关键词

Metal-organic framework; Light hydrocarbons; Adsorption separation; DFT calculation

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2016YFB0301500]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21722609, 21436010]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR17B060001]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018XZZX002-14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ideal metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are those have not only significant adsorption separation performances but also excellent vapor and/or thermal stability. In this work, a calcium-based metal-organic framework with high vapor-stability and thermostability, Ca(squarate), was prepared using readily available precursor (CaCO3) and squaric acid as starting materials by hydrothermal method. Characterization techniques including PXRD, TGA and BET surface area analysis reveal that this MOF remains stable no matter whether it was soaked in water or exposed to air for as long as 2 weeks. Moreover, the studied MOF material is capable of discriminating C-2 hydrocarbon molecules as it has an appropriate pore diameter around 3.4 angstrom. Excellent efficient separation for C2H2/C2H4 mixture (50:50, v/v) with an adsorption selectivity of 8.1 was realized at room temperature and ambient pressure, on the other hand, it also displayed a good separation performance for C2H4/C4H6 mixture (50:50, v/v) with an adsorption selectivity of 5.9. Furthermore, adsorption mechanism of C-2 hydrocarbons in this framework was investigated by the DFT-D calculation. The results revealed that this framework discriminated light hydrocarbons as a result of different interaction strength between hydrocarbons and framework that mainly arise from pi-pi interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据