4.7 Article

In vitro evaluation of silver doped wollastonite synthesized from natural waste for biomedical applications

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 45, 期 18, 页码 25044-25051

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.169

关键词

Sol-gel method; Bioactivity; Antibacterial activity; Wollastonite; Rice husk ash (RHA) and eggshells

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board & MHRD Government of India [EMR/2016/006870]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study deals with a detailed investigation of bioactivity, degradation and antibacterial activity of silver doped wollastonite (CaSiO3) synthesized using natural waste. Natural waste such as rice husk ash (RHA) and eggshells have been used as precursors for extracting silica (SiO2) and calcium oxide (CaO) respectively. Silver oxide (AgO) (0, 2, 4 and 6 mol%) doped wollastonite at the expense of CaO were synthesized through sol-gel process, and were characterised with thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG/DTA), X-ray diffractometer (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS). Thermal analysis revealed that the crystallization temperature of all samples was below 800 degrees C, and so all samples were sintered at this temperature. The bioactivity was explored in vitro, employing simulated body fluid (SBF) and the hydroxyapatite phase formation was confirmed by XRD. FTIR spectra showed the presence of characteristic functional groups, while, surface morphology was observed using SEM images, revealing the spherical shape of hydroxyapatite. The chemical constituents of apatite were confirmed by EDS spectra. The degradation study results have shown that degradation rate of silver doped wollastonite decreased with increase in silver content. Antibacterial activity was tested using disk diffusion method against different bacteria. Silver doped wollastonite showed good antibacterial activity and enhanced bioactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据