4.7 Article

Co3O4 NPs decorated Mn-Co-O solid solution as highly selective catalyst for aerobic base-free oxidation of 5-HMF to 2,5-FDCA in water

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 355, 期 -, 页码 252-262

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.03.065

关键词

5-Hydroxymethylfurfural; Base-free oxidation; Non-precious metal catalyst; Mn-Co oxide; Oxygen mobility; Acidity-basicity

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21763031, 21603187]
  2. National Special Funds of China [C6176102]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Yunnan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative transformations of HMF are key routes toward a wide variety of chemicals and biofuels through an environmental friendly process. Co3O4 NPs decorated Mn-Co-O solid solution, donated as Co3O4/MnXCo, was prepared by co-precipitation method and used as non-precious metal catalyst for base-free oxidation of HMF to FDCA in the presence of O-2 and water. Comprehensive characterizations such as XRD, H-2-TPR, O-2-TPD, XPS, NH3/CO2-TPD and TEM were used to study materials properties especially the oxygen mobility and acidity-basicity. The effect of Mn/Co molar ratio in catalyst and the reaction conditions were investigated and optimized. In addition, the kinetics of the reaction was monitored to reveal the reaction route and rate-determining step. The variation of Mn/Co molar ratio was found to affect not only HMF conversion but also distribution of products. When the Mn/Co ratio was of 0.2, the Co3O4/Mn0.2Co catalyst showed the optimal catalytic performance (i.e.,> 99% yield of FDCA obtained under 1 bar O-2 at 140 degrees C after 24 h) due to the highest content of both Lewis and Bronsted acid sites on the surface, leading to the strongest ability of HMF adsorption and COOH group formation, as well as the enhanced oxygen mobility. This catalyst was shown stable after a minor deactivation (<= 8%) during six recycling uses and its activity can be entirely regenerated by calcination in air.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据