4.8 Article

BET Inhibitors Potentiate Chemotherapy and Killing of SPOP-Mutant Colon Cancer Cells via Induction of DR5

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 79, 期 6, 页码 1191-1203

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3223

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA172136, R01CA213028, R01CA217141, U19AI068021, R01CA215481, U01CA152753]
  2. UPMC Hillman Cancer Center institutional funds
  3. [P30CA047904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) family proteins such as BRD4 are epigenetic readers that control expression of a number of oncogenic proteins. Targeting this family of proteins has recently emerged as a promising anticancer approach. BET inhibitors (BETi), either alone or in combination with other anticancer agents, have exhibited efficacy in a variety of tumors. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying differential response to BETi are not well understood. In this study, we report that death receptor 5 (DR5), a key component of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, is markedly induced in response to BRD4 depletion and BETi treatment in colorectal cancer cells. Induction of DR5, following BET inhibition, was mediated by endoplasmic reticulum stress and CHOP-dependent transcriptional activation. Enhanced DR5 induction was necessary for the chemosensitization and apoptotic effects of BETi and was responsible for increased BETi sensitivity in colorectal cancer cells containing a mutation in speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP), a subunit of BRD4 E3 ubiquitin ligase. In a colorectal cancer xenograft model, BETi combined with chemotherapy suppressed the tumor growth in a DR5-dependent manner and potently inhibited patient-derived xenograft tumor growth with enhanced DR5 induction and apoptosis. These findings suggest that BETi alone or in combination with chemotherapy is effective against colorectal cancer due to enhanced DR5 induction and apoptosis. DR5 induction may also serve as a useful marker for designing personalized treatment and improved colorectal cancer combination therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据