4.7 Article

Exploiting Honokiol-induced ER stress CHOP activation inhibits the growth and metastasis of melanoma by suppressing the MITF and β-catenin pathways

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 442, 期 -, 页码 113-125

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.026

关键词

Melanoma; ER stress; Metastasis; MITF; Honokiol

类别

资金

  1. [TCVGH-VHCY1068601]
  2. [TCVGH-VHCY1058601]
  3. [TCVGH-VHCY1048605]
  4. [TCVGH-VHCY1038603]
  5. [TCVGH-VHCY1028601]
  6. [TCVGH-1057307C]
  7. [TCVGH-1067327D]
  8. [TCVGH-1067305C]
  9. [TCVGH-1077329D]
  10. [TCVGH-1077311C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is increasing global incidence of highly metastatic melanoma and therapeutic strategies like those focusing on the downstream beta-catenin/MITF axis of invading melanoma cells are urgently needed. Targeting endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can promote cancer cell death and inhibit epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) in metastatic tumors. This study aimed to determine if Honokiol could promote ER stress-dependent apoptosis and regulate metastatic melanoma. The therapeutic efficacy of Honokiol was assessed using the highly metastatic melanoma xenograft mouse model for peritoneal metastasis and evaluated by computed tomography imaging. The ER stress marker, Calpain-10, delineated a novel proteolytic cleavage enzyme, while CHOP/GADD153-regulated apoptosis was used for gene silencing to determine the role of the beta-catenin/MITF axis in melanoma cells. The results showed that Honokiol effectively decreased peritoneal dissemination and organ metastasis via ER stress activation and EMT marker inhibition. Knockdown Calpain-10 or CHOP/GADD153 blocked all of the biological effects in Honokiol-induced beta-catenin/MITF cleavage, ERSE or TCF/LEF luciferase activity, and beta-catenin kinase activity. These findings suggest that Honokiol can significantly thwart the progression of highly metastatic melanoma using the beta-catenin/MITF axis via prompt Calpain-10 and CHOP/GADD153 regulated cascades.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据