4.4 Article

Clinically relevant concentrations of lidocaine inhibit tumor angiogenesis through suppressing VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 83, 期 6, 页码 1007-1015

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03815-4

关键词

Lidocaine; Local anesthetics; Tumor angiogenesis; VEGF; VEGFR2

资金

  1. Hubei University of Arts and Science [RG2015668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundAngiogenesis, the formation of blood vessel, is required for invasive tumor growth and metastasis. In this study, the effects of lidocaine, an amide-link local anesthetic, on angiogenesis and tumor growth were investigated.MethodsIn vitro angiogenesis assays were conducted using human umbilical vascular endothelial cell (HUVEC). Essential molecules involved in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling were analyzed. Tumor angiogenesis was analyzed using in vivo mouse tumor model.ResultsLidocaine at clinically relevant concentrations inhibited angiogenesis. Lidocaine inhibited endothelial cell in vitro capillary network formation on Matrigel through interfering early stage of angiogenesis. In addition, lidocaine inhibited vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-stimulated endothelial cell migration and proliferation without affecting cell adhesion. Lidocaine also induced endothelial cell apoptosis in the presence of VEGF. Lidocaine suppressed VEGF-activated phosphorylation of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), PLC-PKC-MAPK and FAK-paxillin in endothelial cells, demonstrating that VEGF, PLC, MAPK and FAK-paxillin suppression is associated with the antiangiogenic effect of lidocaine. Importantly, the in vitro observations were translatable to in vivo B16 melanoma mouse model. Lidocaine significantly inhibited tumor angiogenesis, leading to delay of tumor growth.ConclusionsThis study is the first to report that lidocaine acts as an angiogenesis inhibitor. The findings provide preclinical evidence into the potential mechanisms by which lidocaine may negatively affect cancer growth and metastasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据