4.7 Article

Deficiencies of microglia and TNFα in the mPFC-mediated cognitive inflexibility induced by social stress during adolescence

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 256-266

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.02.010

关键词

Adolescent social stress; Medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC); Microglia; Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha); Set-shifting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771217, 81471122, 31470988]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJZD-EW-L04]
  3. CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The crucial roles played by microglia and their release of cytokines in the regulation of brain maturation are increasingly being recognized. Adolescence is a unique period characterized by continued brain maturation, especially in the area of the prefrontal cortex. Our previous studies showed that adolescent social stress induced impairment in extradimensional set-shifting (EDS), a core component of cognitive flexibility mediated by the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in adult mice. The present study further determined the role of microglia and the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) in cognitive dysfunction. Accompanied by a deficit in EDS in adulthood, previously stressed mice showed significant reductions in the expression of the microglial molecular biomarker Iba1, cell numbers, and the levels of TNF alpha mRNA and protein in the mPFC. Pharmacological inhibition of TNF alpha signaling by direct injection of a neutralizer into the mPFC also specifically impaired EDS performance. Moreover, the cognitive and immune alterations in previously stressed adult mice were ameliorated by both acute LPS and chronic antidepressant treatment. Together, our data suggest that microglia and TNF alpha play important roles in cognitive flexibility and can provide attractive therapeutic targets for the treatment of cognitive deficits in psychiatric disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据