4.0 Article

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring tolerability and blood pressure status in adolescents: the SHIP AHOY study

期刊

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 12-17

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000354

关键词

adolescents; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; hypertension

资金

  1. AHA [15SFRN23680000]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR001425]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) provides a more precise assessment of blood pressure (BP) status than clinic BP and is currently recommended in the evaluation of elevated BP in children and adolescents. Yet, ABPM can be uncomfortable for patients and cumbersome to perform. Objective Evaluation of the tolerability to ABPM in 232 adolescent participants (median age: 15.7 years, 64% white, 16% Hispanic, 53% male) in the Study of Hypertension In Pediatrics Adult Hypertension Onset in Youth and its potential effects on ABPM results. Participants and methods Ambulatory BP status (normal vs. hypertension) was determined by sex and height-specific pediatric cut-points. Participants were asked to rank their wake and sleep tolerability to ABPM from 1 (most tolerant) to 10 (least tolerant); those with tolerability score of at least 8 were considered ABPM intolerant. Results Forty-three (19%) participants had wake ambulatory hypertension (HTN), 42 (18%) had sleep ambulatory HTN, and 64 (28%) had overall (wake and/or sleep) ambulatory HTN. Forty (17%) participants were intolerant to ABPM during wake hours and 58 (25%) were intolerant during sleep. ABPM intolerance during wake (but not sleep) hours was independently associated with wake (odds ratio: 2.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-5.39) and overall (odds ratio: 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-7.18) ambulatory HTN. Conclusion Poor tolerability to ABPM is associated with a higher prevalence of ambulatory HTN in adolescents, and should be taken into consideration at time of ABPM interpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据