4.8 Article

Molecularly imprinted photoelectrochemical sensor for fumonisin B1 based on GO-CdS heterojunction

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 57-63

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.11.040

关键词

Photoelectroehemical sensor; GO-CdS heterojunction; Molecularly imprinted polymer; Fumonisin B-1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11674085, 21375033]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2011CDA111, 2014CFA015]
  3. National College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Programs [201610512044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rapid and ultrasensitive molecularly imprinted photoelectrochemical (MIP-PEC) sensing platform based on ITO electrode modified with GO-CdS heterojunction was prepared for ultrasensitive measure of fumonisin B-1 (FB1). CdS quantum dots (QDs) were combined with a suitable amount of graphene oxide (GO) to form a heterojunction to enhance signal response with accurately calculating energy levels (VB/CB or HOMO/LUMO). The MIP-PEC sensor was successful fabricated after MIP was immobilized on the electrode with the basis of these results. In the phosphate buffer solution (PBS), it was clearly observed that the non-elution MIP-PEC sensor had almost no photocurrent response, which was due to the slower electron transfer speed. When the MIP-PEC sensor is eluted in ethanol, its photocurrent response was significantly restored, that was because the fact that the template molecules were washed away, and electron donors entered the holes and accelerated the electron transfer. Its photocurrent response was reduced because of holes blocked when the MIP-PEC sensor was hatched in the template molecules culture fluid. This phenomenon fully showed that the MIP-PEC sensor can specifically detect the target. Thus, The work has a linear range from 0.01 to 1000 ng mL(-1) with a detection limit of 4.7 pg mL(-1) for FB1. Furthermore, the fabricated MIP-PEC sensor will confirm the actual application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据