4.5 Article

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine derivatives

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 1350-1356

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.03.044

关键词

Electrophilic acetylation; Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine; Vilsmeier-Haack formylation; Chemical space; Chemical library; Diversity-oriented synthesis; Biological activity

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2017R1A2A2A05069364, NRF-2018R1A6A1A03023718, 2015M3A9B6027818, 2016K2A9A1A03904900]
  2. Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology [KK1703-F02, KK1803-F00, KK1932-20]
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [KK1932-20, KK1803-F00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015M3A9B6027818] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-based chemical territory was expanded via construction of new chemical library with distinctive substitution patterns, which was made possible by regiodivergent electrophilic acylation followed by aldol condensation. Biological screening of the compounds in this class revealed that the viability of human lymphoma U937 cells was strongly inhibited by 6b with a methoxy group at the o-position of the aromatic ring, but not by compounds 6t-w bearing a halogen at the o-position. Furthermore, 6x having a 2,4-dimethoxyphenyl group inhibited the survival of U937 cells more potently than 6b. In contrast, 6y possessing a 2,5-dimethoxyphenyl moiety did not show effective inhibition, implying the importance of orientation of the substituent(s) around the benzene ring. The anticancer action of 6x with safe therapeutic window could be associated with the FTase-p38 signaling axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据