4.1 Article

Economic Change in the Prehistoric Hexi Corridor (4800-2200 bp), North-West China

期刊

ARCHAEOMETRY
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 957-976

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12464

关键词

subsistence strategy; transcontinental culture exchange; culture evolution; Hexi Corridor; late Neolithic and Bronze Age

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA2004010101]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0606402]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41620104007, 41825001]
  4. International Partnership Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [131C11KYSB20160061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is widely known that the Hexi Corridor in North-West China lies at a hub of trans-Eurasian cultural exchange. Its role became increasingly important during the late prehistoric period, particularly as the ancient Silk Road began to be used. While the profound transformation of local cultural characteristics in the late Neolithic and the Bronze Age is well documented, the detailed economic dynamics of cultural evolution have not yet been clearly illustrated. In this paper, we report on significant new zooarchaeological and faunal isotopic data from the Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in the Hexi Corridor. The primary objective is to systematically reconstruct the prehistoric economic context of this area by combining these new data with previous archaeological studies and radiocarbon dates. We argue that the primary economic activities of local inhabitants changed dramatically in the prehistoric Hexi Corridor. This was marked by agricultural production at c.4800-4000 bp, agro-pastoralproduction at c.4000-3000 bp and animal husbandry at c.3000-2200 bp, respectively. The major subsistence strategies of these three periods show considerable variation. It is very likely that these transformations of economic patterns in the prehistoric Hexi Corridor were primarily triggered by transcontinental cultural exchange and, to a lesser extent, by climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据