4.8 Article

Ilmenite oxidation kinetics for pressurized chemical looping combustion of natural gas

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 747-759

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.126

关键词

Pressurized chemical looping combustion; Ilmenite; Oxidation reaction; PTGA; Kinetic modelling; Carbon capture

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Carbon Management Canada
  3. Natural Resources Canada, Government of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pressurized Chemical Looping Combustion (PCLC) is a promising technology for mitigating CO2 emission from fossil fuel combustion. This work investigates the oxidation kinetics of a natural ilmenite ore to assess the PCLC of natural gas since process economics are largely dependent on the air reactor performance, and data at pressurized conditions are scarce. Thermogravimetric experiments were conducted varying the temperature from 800 to 1050 degrees C and the oxygen partial pressure from 0.2 to 1.7 bar at a total pressure of 8 bar. The total pressure was also varied from 1 to 16 bar at 900 degrees C with air. The total pressure was found to hinder the rate of the oxidation reaction when maintaining a constant O-2 partial pressure and enhance the rate of the oxidation reaction when maintaining a constant O-2 volume fraction, up to a threshold. The oxidation kinetics were modelled using a dual-step mechanism; random nucleation and growth followed by solid-state diffusion. The activation energy and reaction order with respect to oxygen were found to respectively be 16.6 kJ/mol and 0.34 for the nucleation and growth, and 48.7 kJ/mol and 1.26 for the solid-state diffusion regime. Finally, considering the design and economics of PCLC, it was shown that elevated O-2 partial pressures negatively affect the ilmenite particle structural integrity subjecting it to fragmentation, whereas lower O-2 partial pressures favour the migration of iron to the particle surface where inherent attrition loses would result in an enriched titanium ore as spent material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据