4.6 Article

Regime switching model estimation: spectral clustering hidden Markov model

期刊

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 303, 期 1-2, 页码 297-319

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03140-2

关键词

Data mining; Spectral clustering; Hidden Markov models; Markov regime-switching; Feature construction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed SC-HMM is a novel method for accurate estimation of MRS models, especially suitable for HMMs with continuous observations. It utilizes spectral clustering for latent state identification and estimates conditional distribution statistics and transitional probabilities based on identified latent states.
We propose a novel method for Markov regime switching (MRS) model estimations by spectral clustering hidden Markov model (SC-HMM). The proposed SC-HMM exploits the Markov property of hidden states and utilizes pairwise feature similarities for latent state identifications. It can be applied to general hidden Markov models (HMMs) with continuous observations. In contrast to the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), SC-HMM predicts latent states and yields conditional distribution statistics without knowledge of types of conditional distributions. To illustrate, SC-HMM is first applied to a simple HMM with discrete observations. We consider the MRS model estimation with continuous observations to further demonstrate SC-HMM. Specifically, based on local observations, we propose a set of features for the MRS estimation. A similarity matrix is determined from derived features and spectral clustering predicts latent states. Conditional distribution statistics and transitional probabilities are estimated based on identified latent states. By conducting simulation studies on both two-state and three-state MRS estimations, we demonstrate that, in comparison with MLE, the proposed SC-HMM is more robust. Furthermore, we demonstrate the validity of SC-HMM by estimating a two-state MRS from the S&P/TSX Composite Index daily and monthly data from 1977 to 2014.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据