期刊
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 130, 期 4, 页码 1008-1017出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004070
关键词
-
资金
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [572647]
- Australia and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists [11027]
- Australian Government
- University of Western Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship [1042341]
- Mundipharma Australian
- New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Research Fellowship for 2011
BACKGROUND: The propensities for the upper airway to collapse during anesthesia and sleep are related, although much of our understanding of this relationship has been inferred from clinical observation and indirect measures such as the apnea-hypopnea index. The aim of this study was to use an identical, rigorous, direct measure of upper airway collapsibility (critical closing pressure of the upper airway) under both conditions to allow the magnitude of upper airway collapsibility in each state to be precisely compared. METHODS: Ten subjects (8 men and 2 women; mean +/- SD: age, 40.4 +/- 12.1 years; body mass index, 28.5 +/- 4.0 kg/m(2)) were studied. Critical closing pressure of the upper airway was measured in each subject on separate days during (1) propofol anesthesia and (2) sleep. RESULTS: Critical closing pressure of the upper airway measurements were obtained in all 10 subjects during nonrapid eye movement sleep and, in 4 of these 10 subjects, also during rapid eye movement sleep. Critical closing pressure of the upper airway during anesthesia was linearly related to critical closing pressure of the upper airway during nonrapid eye movement sleep (r = 0.64 [95% CI, 0.02-0.91]; n = 10; P = .046) with a similar tendency in rapid eye movement sleep (r = 0.80 [95% CI, -0.70 to 0.99]; n = 4; P = .200). However, critical closing pressure of the upper airway during anesthesia was systematically greater (indicating increased collapsibility) than during nonrapid eye movement sleep (2.1 +/- 2.2 vs -2.0 +/- 3.2 cm H2O, respectively, n = 10; within-subject mean difference, 4.1 cm H2O [95% CI, 2.32-5.87]; P < .001) with a similar tendency during rapid eye movement sleep (1.6 +/- 2.4 vs -1.9 +/- 4.3 cm H2O, respectively, n = 4; unadjusted difference, 3.5 cm H2O [95% CI, -0.95 to 7.96]; P = .087). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the magnitude of upper airway collapsibility during anesthesia and sleep is directly related. However, the upper airway is systematically more collapsible during anesthesia than sleep, suggesting greater vulnerability to upper airway obstruction in the anesthetized state.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据