4.5 Article

Rhabdomyolysis - Go big or go home

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 2194-2196

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.024

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the occurrence of renal injury in hospitalized patients with the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis among a series of patients presenting to an urban emergency department. Methods: A retrospective chart review between January 2006 and February 2017 was conducted on patients aged 21-65 years old that were admitted with a diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis. We included patients with an initial serum creatinine (Cr) level < 1.3 mg/dL and an initial serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level > 1000 U/L. We excluded patients with preexisting renal disease, hypertension, diabetes, patients currently on medications in the statin class, patients with muscular dystrophy and neuromuscular disorders. Results: One hundred and fifteen patients (100 men, 15 women) were enrolled, with a mean age of 36 years old. The mean CPK at presentation was 18,965 U/L and the highest CPK was 168,300 U/L. The mean Cr upon presentation was 0.95 mg/dL. The average length of stay of our patients was 4.6 days. The longest length of stay was 30 days and the shortest was 1 day. Seven patients had hospital stays longer than 10 days. None of the patients had prolonged admissions due to rhabdomyolysis alone. The patient admitted for 30 days had a protracted admission due to liver failure and sepsis thought to be unrelated to Rhabdomyolysis. No patients that fit our inclusion criteria developed renal insufficiency (Cr > 1.3 mg/dL) or failure regardless of their CPK upon presentation, peak CPK or therapies received during their hospitalization. Conclusion: Patients in our data set that presented to the Emergency Department with a CPK of >1000 U/L and a Cr of <1.3 mg/dL that were hospitalized with a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis are not at risk for developing renal insufficiency or failure if treated promptly with fluid rehydration, regardless of their initial CPK values. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据