4.6 Article

Alternative polyadenylation dependent function of splicing factor SRSF3 contributes to cellular senescence

期刊

AGING-US
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 1356-1388

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.101836

关键词

senescence; alternative polyadenylation; SRSF3; PTEN; 3 ' UTR

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1003500]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2015CB943000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771336, 31521003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Down-regulated splicing factor SRSF3 is known to promote cellular senescence, an important biological process in preventing cancer and contributing to individual aging, via its alternative splicing dependent function in human cells. Here we discovered alternative polyadenylation (APA) dependent function of SRSF3 as a novel mechanism explaining SRSF3 downregulation induced cellular senescence. Knockdown of SRSF3 resulted in preference usage of proximal poly(A) sites and thus global shortening of 3' untranslated regions (3' UTRs) of mRNAs. SRSF3-depletion also induced senescence-related phenotypes in both human and mouse cells. These 3' UTR shortened genes were enriched in senescence-associated pathways. Shortened 3' UTRs tended to produce more proteins than the longer ones. Simulating the effects of 3' UTR shortening by overexpression of three candidate genes (PTEN, PIAS1 and DNMT3A) all led to senescence-associated phenotypes. Mechanistically, SRSF3 has higher binding density near proximal poly(A) site than distal one in 3' UTR shortened genes. Further, upregulation of PTEN by either ectopic overexpression or SRSF3-knockdown induction both led to reduced phosphorylation of AKT and ultimately senescence-associated phenotypes. We revealed for the first time that reduced SRSF3 expression could promote cellular senescence through its APA-dependent function, largely extending our mechanistic understanding in splicing factor regulated cellular senescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据