4.7 Review

Understanding and improving multidisciplinary team working in geriatric medicine

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 498-505

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz021

关键词

high performing teams; comprehensive geriatric assessment; multidisciplinary teams; non-technical skills; patient safety; older people

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  2. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  3. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  4. King's College London
  5. Guy's and St Thomas' Charity
  6. Maudsley Charity
  7. NIHR [12/5003//01]
  8. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  9. the Health Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Geriatric medicine is a speciality that has historically relied on team working to best serve patients. The nature of frailty in older people means that people present with numerous co-morbidities, which in turn require a team-based approach to be managed, including allied health professionals, social work and nursing alongside medicine. The 'engine room' of the speciality has thus for many years been the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting-something other specialities have discovered only recently. Yet, rather paradoxically, the speciality has been slow compared to others (e.g. trauma, surgery, cancer) to reflect more formally on how team working can be enhanced, trained and supported in geriatric teams. This paper is a reflective review, grounded on our respective expertise in geriatric medicine and improvement science, on practice and its changing patterns within geriatric medicine, and the role of MDTs within it (Part 1). It offers a perspective from behavioural safety science, which has been studying team-working in healthcare for the last 20 years (Part 2) and concludes with practical suggestions, based on evidence, on how to integrate evidence and best practice into modern geriatric medicine-to address current and future challenges (Part 3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Letter Surgery

Bridging the Theory-to-Practice Gap in Crisis Management

Petrut Gogalniceanu, Nick Sevdalis, Nizam Mamode

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2023)

Review Anesthesiology

Human factors in anaesthesia: a narrative review

F. E. Kelly, C. Frerk, C. R. Bailey, T. M. Cook, K. Ferguson, R. Flin, K. Fong, P. Groom, C. John, A. R. Lang, T. Meek, K. L. Miller, L. Richmond, N. Sevdalis, M. R. Stacey

Summary: Healthcare relies on high levels of human performance, but this is not always reliable, especially in high-pressure situations. Other safety-critical industries have successfully integrated human factors principles to improve safety, and it is possible to do the same in anaesthesia.

ANAESTHESIA (2023)

Article Anesthesiology

Implementing human factors in anaesthesia: guidance for clinicians, departments and hospitals Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society and the Association of Anaesthetists

F. E. Kelly, C. Frerk, C. R. Bailey, T. M. Cook, K. Ferguson, R. Flin, K. Fong, P. Groom, C. John, A. R. Lang, T. Meek, K. L. Miller, L. Richmond, N. Sevdalis, M. R. Stacey

Summary: Human factors is a scientific discipline used in safety critical industries to improve safety and worker well-being. The Difficult Airway Society and the Association of Anaesthetists established a Working Party to encourage the adoption of human factors science in anaesthesia. A set of 12 recommendations were formulated, focusing on design, barriers, mitigations, and education and training strategies.

ANAESTHESIA (2023)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review

Rebecca Appleton, Phoebe Barnett, Norha Vera San Juan, Elizabeth Tuudah, Natasha Lyons, Jennie Parker, Emily Roxburgh, Spyros Spyridonidis, Millie Tamworth, Minnie Worden, Melisa Yilmaz, Nick Sevdalis, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Justin J. J. Needle, Sonia Johnson

Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid adoption of telemental health care, but there are significant variations and barriers in its implementation. This review aimed to identify strategies for effective implementation and evaluate their impact.

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2023)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Conceptual and practical challenges associated with understanding patient safety within community-based mental health services

Phoebe Averill, Charles Vincent, Gurpreet Reen, Claire Henderson, Nick Sevdalis

Summary: Patient safety problems in community-based mental health care have received less research attention compared to physical health care. This study aimed to investigate the conceptual and empirical challenges in understanding patient safety in community-based mental health care. The review found challenges in defining safety, evaluating safety in long-term care journeys, and establishing what constitutes a 'preventable' safety problem in this context.

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS (2023)

Article Psychiatry

Psychological factors associated with reporting side effects following COVID-19 vaccination: A prospective cohort study (CoVAccS-Wave 3)

Louise E. Smith, Julius Sim, Susan M. Sherman, Richard Amlot, Megan Cutts, Hannah Dasch, Nick Sevdalis, G. James Rubin

Summary: The study aimed to investigate symptom reporting after the first and second COVID-19 vaccine doses, attribution of symptoms to the vaccine, and factors associated with symptom reporting. It was found that after the first dose, 74.1% of participants reported at least one injection-site symptom, while 65.0% reported at least one other symptom. After the second dose, 52.9% reported at least one injection-site symptom and 43.7% reported at least one other symptom. Women and younger people were more likely to report symptoms from vaccination.

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH (2023)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a personalised self-management intervention for living with long COVID: protocol for the LISTEN randomised controlled trial

Claire Potter, Fiona Leggat, Rachel Lowe, Philip Pallmann, Muhammad Riaz, Christy Barlow, Adrian Edwards, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Nick Sevdalis, Bernadette Sewell, Jackie McRae, Jessica Fish, Maria Ines de Sousa de Abreu, Fiona Jones, Monica Busse

Summary: The LISTEN trial aims to evaluate the effects of personalized self-management support intervention on individuals living with long COVID. The study uses a randomized trial design with the LISTEN intervention group and usual care group. Data will be collected through online self-reported outcome measures. The study will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the LISTEN intervention and conduct a detailed process evaluation.

TRIALS (2023)

Article Oncology

Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A national mixed-method survey study

Tayana Soukup, David Winters, Kia-Chong Chua, Philip Rowland, Jacqueline Moneke, Ted A. Skolarus, Rasiah Bharathan, Leanne Harling, Anish Bali, Viren Asher, Tasha Gandamihardja, Nick Sevdalis, James S. A. Green, Benjamin W. Lamb

Summary: This study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) and the challenges faced by MDTs in decision-making, communication, and participation in MDT meetings. The findings showed that hybrid working and virtual attendance were introduced due to COVID-19 and MDTs would like to maintain these changes. However, issues related to IT, slower meetings, longer lists, and delays were identified, highlighting the need for improvement in IT infrastructure. On the positive side, virtual meetings and increased attendance/availability of clinicians were noted as outcomes of the changes. The study also found significant improvement in meeting organization and logistics, but some indication of worsening in case discussions.

CANCER MEDICINE (2023)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

A survey and stakeholder consultation of Independent Domestic Violence Advisor (IDVA) programmes in English maternity services

Camilla Forbes, Hayley Alderson, Jill Domoney, Alexandra Papamichail, Vashti Berry, Ruth McGovern, Nick Sevdalis, Judith Rankin, Mary Newburn, Andy Healey, Abigail Easter, Margaret Heslin, Gene Feder, Kristian Hudson, Claire A. Wilson, G. J. Melendez-Torres, Louise M. Howard, Kylee Trevillion

Summary: This study aimed to investigate the implementation of healthcare-based Independent Domestic Violence Advisors (hIDVA) programmes in maternity services in England. The results showed that 69% of the surveyed trusts reported having a hIDVA programme, with 55% of them operating within maternity services. Key facilitators for implementation included staff training, communication, co-creation, and support from management. Barriers included lack of private workspace, funding issues, and recruitment challenges for hIDVA staff.

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Analysis of communication styles underpinning clinical decision-making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings

Tayana Soukup, Benjamin W. Lamb, James S. A. Green, Nick Sevdalis, Ged Murtagh

Summary: In cancer care, MDT meetings are crucial, but concerns have been raised regarding their quality. This study analyzes the dynamics of teamwork in MDT meetings, finding that surgeons initiate and respond to interactions the most, speaking 47% of the time. Cancer nurse specialists and coordinators are the least frequent initiators, speaking only 4% and 1% respectively. The study also reveals high interactivity in the meetings, with an initiator-responder ratio of 1:1.63, and an increase in verbal dysfluencies in the second half.

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2023)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Evaluating quality improvement at scale: A pilot study on routine reporting for executive board governance in a UK National Health Service organisation

Kia-Chong Chua, Claire Henderson, Barbara Grey, Michael Holland, Nick Sevdalis

Summary: This study explores how routine reporting can improve visibility in the quality improvement governance process. Findings show that project outcomes and team achievements are not systematically documented, and factors such as service user involvement, quality of measurement plan, and fidelity of plan-do-study-act cycles significantly impact project adoption.

EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING (2023)

Article Urology & Nephrology

An introduction to quality improvement

Stephanie J. Russ, James Green, Louise de Winter, Ellie Herrington, Archie Hughes-Hallett, Julia M. Taylor, Nick Sevdalis

Summary: In the past 30 years, there has been a significant focus on quality in international healthcare. This is due to the recognition of variations in patient outcomes caused by inconsistent implementation of evidence-based actions during patient care. Healthcare professionals have shown a growing interest in utilizing knowledge and techniques from outside the medical field to improve patient care standards. This article introduces Quality Improvement methodology and concepts to Urology departments in the UK, providing an overview of key principles and organizational support for QI work.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

'Beyond places of safety' - a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England

Una Foye, Rebecca Appleton, Patrick Nyikavaranda, Natasha Lyons, Ceri Dare, Chris Lynch, Karen Persaud, Nafiso Ahmed, Ruth Stuart, Merle Schlief, Xia Huong, Nick Sevdalis, Luke Sheridan-Rains, Antonio Rojas-Garcia, Martin Stefan, Jeremy Clark, Alan Simpson, Sonia Johnson, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans

Summary: Mental health acute and crisis care consumes a significant portion of mental health budgets worldwide, but is often deemed unsatisfactory and difficult to access. This study aims to understand the factors that aid or hinder the implementation of innovative mental health crisis care projects in England. Findings suggest that bottom-up development, service user involvement, collaborative working, and leadership and management buy-in are key facilitators to implementation, while complexities in crisis care, workforce challenges, and resourcing issues act as barriers.

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2023)

Article Psychiatry

Investigating the association between characteristics of local crisis care systems and service use in an English national survey

Antonio Rojas-Garcia, Christian Dalton-Locke, Luke Sheridan Rains, Ceri Dare, Cedric Ginestet, Una Foye, Kathleen Kelly, Sabine Landau, Chris Lynch, Paul Mccrone, Shilpa Nairi, Karen Newbigging, Patrick Nyikavaranda, David Osborn, Karen Persaud, Nick Sevdalis, Martin Stefan, Ruth Stuart, Alan Simpson, Sonia Johnson, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans

Summary: This study aims to develop a typology of mental health crisis care systems and explore the relationship between crisis care service models and psychiatric hospital admissions and detentions.

BJPSYCH OPEN (2023)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Implementation and dissemination of home- and community-based interventions for informal caregivers of people living with dementia: a systematic scoping review

Eden Meng Zhu, Martina Buljac-Samardzic, Kees Ahaus, Nick Sevdalis, Robbert Huijsman

Summary: Informal caregivers of people with dementia often experience a decline in quality of life and play a crucial role in providing care at home. Implementation science knowledge is important in improving the outcomes of evidence-based interventions for these caregivers.

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2023)

暂无数据