4.8 Article

Organic Monomolecular Layers Enable Energy-Level Matching for Efficient Hole Transporting Layer Free Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 1625-1634

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b07627

关键词

solar cells; monomolecular layers; interface dipole; energy-level alignment; interface recombination

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project funding from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0202400, 2016YFA0202404]
  2. Peacock Team Project funding from Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [KQTD2015033110182370]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776094]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2015A030306044]
  5. Guangdong Hong Kong joint innovation project [2016A050503012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-efficiency hole transport layer free perovskite solar cells (HTL-free PSCs) with economical and simplified device structure can greatly facilitate the commercialization of PSCs. However, eliminating the key HTL in PSCs results usually in a severe efficiency loss and poor carrier transfer due to the energy-level mismatching at the indium tin oxide (ITO)/perovskite interface. In this study, we solve this issue by introducing an organic monomolecular layer (ML) to raise the effective work function of ITO with the assistance of an interface dipole created by Sn-N bonds. The energy-level alignment at the ITO/perovskite interface is optimized with a barrier-free contact, which favors efficient charge transfer and suppressed nonradiative carrier recombination. The HTL-free PSCs based on the ML-modified ITO yield an efficiency of 19.4%, much higher than those of HTL-free PSCs on bare ITO (10.26%), comparable to state-of-the-art PSCs with a HTL. This study provides an in-depth understanding of the mechanism of interfacial energy-level alignment and facilitates the design of advanced interfacial materials for simplified and efficient PSC devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据