4.7 Article

Quality Evaluation of Solution Sets in Multiobjective Optimisation: A Survey

期刊

ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3300148

关键词

Quality evaluation; performance assessment; indicator; metric; measure; multobjective optimisation; multi-criteria optimisation; exact method; heuristic; metaheuristic; evolutionary algorithms

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0804003]
  2. EPSRC [EP/J017515/1, EP/P005578/1]
  3. Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams [2017ZT07X386]
  4. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016112514355531]
  5. Science and Technology Innovation Committee Foundation of Shenzhen [ZDSYS201703031748284]
  6. Program for University Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province [2017KSYS008]
  7. EPSRC [EP/P005578/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complexity and variety of modern multiobjective optimisation problems result in the emergence of numerous search techniques, from traditional mathematical programming to various randomised heuristics. A key issue raised consequently is how to evaluate and compare solution sets generated by these multiobjective search techniques. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of solution set quality evaluation. Starting with an introduction of basic principles and concepts of set quality evaluation, this article summarises and categorises 100 state-of-the-art quality indicators, with the focus on what quality aspects these indicators reflect. This is accompanied in each category by detailed descriptions of several representative indicators and in-depth analyses of their strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, issues regarding attributes that indicators possess and properties that indicators are desirable to have are discussed, in the hope of motivating researchers to look into these important issues when designing quality indicators and of encouraging practitioners to bear these issues in mind when selecting/using quality indicators. Finally, future trends and potential research directions in the area are suggested, together with some guidelines on these directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据