4.6 Article

2017 Clinical trials update in new treatments of β-thalassemia

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 91, 期 11, 页码 1135-1145

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24530

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The underlying basis of beta-thalassemia pathology is the diminished beta-globin synthesis leading to a-globin accumulation and premature apoptotic destruction of erythroblasts, causing oxidative stress-induced ineffective erythropoiesis, bone marrow hyperplasia, splenomegaly, and increased intestinal iron absorption with progressive iron overload. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying this disease led to the recognition of new targets with potential therapeutic utility. Agents such as JAK2 inhibitors and TGF-beta ligand traps that reduce the ineffective erythropoiesis process are already being tested in clinical trials with promising results. Other agents that aim to reduce oxidative stress (activators of Foxo3, HRI-eIF2aP, Prx2, Hsp70, and PK anti-oxidant systems and inhibitors of HO-1) and to decrease iron overload (hepcidin agonists, erythroferrone inhibitors and exogenous transferrin) are also under experimental investigation. Significant progress has also been made in the area of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with several ongoing clinical trials examining new condition regimens as well as different donor selection and stem cell source options. Gene therapy has reached a critical point and phase 1 clinical trials have recently been launched to examine the effectiveness and especially long term safety. Epigenetic manipulation and genomic editing of the g-or b-globin gene are novel and promising experimental gene therapy approaches for b-thalassemia giving hope for cure for this chronic disease. This review outlines the key points of the molecular mechanisms underlying b-thalassemia in relation to the development of new therapies and an update is given both at the pre-clinical and clinical level. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据