4.4 Article

Relation Between Echocardiogram-Based Cardiac Parameters and Outcome in Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 118, 期 9, 页码 1356-1362

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.060

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japanese Society of Echocardiography, Osaka, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purposes of this study were to investigate whether heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) share echocardiographic predictors and elucidate E/(e' x s') that predicts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) independent of other echocardiographic parameters in each HF group. We assessed tissue Doppler-derived parameters [E/e', E/(e' x s')] and left ventricular and right ventricular longitudinal strains in HFrEF (n = 340) and HFpEF (n = 102). Left ventricular and right ventricular longitudinal strains were significantly higher and E/(e' x s') was lower in patients with HFpEF compared with those with HFrEF, whereas E/e' was similar between the groups. During a median follow-up of 342 days, MACE developed in 95 patients with HFrEF and 29 with HFpEF. The univariable analysis revealed similar echo cardiographic predictors between the 2 groups, including E/e', E/(e' x s') and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. No 2-dimensional speckle tracking derived parameter remained significant in multivariable models in each HF group. E/(e' x s') was an only independent predictor with an incremental prognostic value over the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score and was superior to the E/e' ratio in both HFrEF and HFpEF. In conclusion, despite differences in echocardiography-based cardiac function parameters between HFrEF and HFpEF, these HF phenotypes shared the same echocardiographic predictors of future MACE. E/(e' x s') was an only independent predictor for future cardiac events in both HF populations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据