4.5 Article

Effect of ColchiciNe on the InciDence of Atrial Fibrillation in Open Heart Surgery Patients: END-AF Trial

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 102-107

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.05.006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and may result in significant morbidity and increased hospital stay. This study was conducted to determine if colchicine administered preoperatively to patients undergoing cardiac surgery and continued during hospitalization is effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative AF. Methods In this multicenter prospective randomized open-label study, consecutive patients with no history of AF and scheduled to undergo elective cardiac surgery (n = 360) were randomized to colchicine (n = 179) or no-colchicine (n = 181). Main exclusion criteria were history of AF or supraventricular arrhythmias or absence of sinus rhythm at enrolment, and contraindications to colchicine. Colchicine was orally administered 12 to 24 hours preoperatively and continued until hospital discharge. The primary efficacy end point was documented AF lasting more than 5 minutes. Safety end point was colchicine adverse effects. Results In-hospital mortality was 3.3%. The primary end point of AF occurred in 63 patients (17.5%): 26 (14.5%) in the colchicine group and 37 (20.5%) in the no-colchicine group (relative risk reduction 29.3% [P = .14]). Diarrhea occurred in 54 patients, 44 (24.6%) on colchicine and 10 (5.5%) on no-colchicine (P<.001). Diarrhea led to discontinuation of colchicine in 23 (52%) of the 44 patients. Conclusion Colchicine administered preoperatively to patients undergoing cardiac surgery and continued until hospital discharge failed to significantly reduce the incidence of early postoperative AF. Diarrhea was the most common adverse effect of colchicine leading to its discontinuation in more than half of the patients with this adverse effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据