4.5 Article

Effects of Biochar-Straw on Soil Aggregation, Organic Carbon Distribution, and Wheat Growth

期刊

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
卷 108, 期 5, 页码 2129-2136

出版社

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2016.02.0121

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2012BAD14B11]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of the Ministry of Agriculture, China [201503116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exogenous C application can improve the physicochemical properties and fertility of soil. This study was conducted to determine whether the application of biochar (BC) was better than straw for improving soil structure and crop growth. The short-term effects of exogenous C application on the size distribution of water-stable aggregates, organic C sequestration, and grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were investigated on a silty clay loam soil in the Guanzhong Plain, Northwest China. Biochar and straw were applied at equal C rates: 1, 3, and 10% in straw treatments (Str(1.0), Str(3.0), and Str(10.0), respectively) and 0.8, 2.4, and 8% in BC treatments (BC0.8, BC2.4, and BC8.0, respectively). No-C treatment (CK) was used as the control. The mass proportion of macroaggregates (>0.25 mm) was increased by 16.9% in BC2.4 and 45.8% in BC8.0, and soil organic carbon (SOC) was increased by 13.2 to 155.1% on average in the BC treatments when compared with CK. A small quantity of BC (0.8 and 2.4%) increased microbial biomass C content but decreased dissolved organic C content, while a large quantity of BC (8%) had the reverse effects. Wheat yields were increased by 14.9 and 19.1% in BC0.8 and BC2.4, respectively, while they were decreased by 37.3 and 90.1% in Str(3.0) and Str(10.0), respectively, when compared with CK. Moderately heavy soil BC amendment (e.g., applied rate, 2.4%) is beneficial to soil structure improvement and wheat growth and effective for harmless disposal of excess plant residues in the Guanzhong Plain, Northwest China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据